Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I love the energy of big storms and strong currents of water. They make me feel ALIVE and EXHILERATED. But now a nagging fear eats my ...
-
I was leafing through a book and discovered an article from 2008 that I had cut out and saved in its pages. The article is salient to the ...
-
Two people in my household suffered lasting injuries from the Moderna vaccine Lot 030B21A. These injuries have been verified by multiple doc...
Good analysis, HOWEVER, a few weeks back I used the exact same NRC link to extract data and to re-analyze the basic presumptions of the "natural radiation" baseline. The bottom line is that the natural radiation baseline as it is set, is a complete and utter joke, a travesty, a deception of humanity.
ReplyDeleteThe baseline is at least 6 times higher than it needs to be from ACTUAL background radiation that you can't avoid.
You need to scroll down 2 or 3 pages on my link here to the story I wrote,
http://oahutrading.blogspot.com/p/japan-nuclear-information.html
Here is an Excerpt
Exposing one of the "Big Lies"
In some areas, Radon is not completely avoidable. Mostly it seeps into basements. Radon ventilation systems are very effective, they can reduce this amount at least 50% and maybe 80%, just depends how much air you want to move. So instead of a 37% of your exposure if you reduce that 80% it is 7.5%, plus 5% cosmic, and 3% soil, that is 15%. So by "so called 'natural sources" like med procedures, nuke medicine, those items are jacking up your doe like 400% from where is could be "naturally". the whole natural radiation lie, unravels as a complete joke... about half of us will contract cancer in our lives, and yet you can't prove that any one source caused it. Therefore by the "Scientific Method" radiation cannot be proven to be unsafe, therefore the PNPs Pro Nuke Pimps will state that "natural radiation" is proven to be safe, and therefore a little extra disaster radiation is OK too. Check the chart closely, the PNP lies immediately emerge.
I guess the government would benefit from the taxes of businesses that are of a much larger scale. Instead of planning larger recreational projects for communities, why not invest more on donation?
ReplyDeleteLauren Edith