Today's front page Wall Street Journal article on the plane attack in Austin illustrates the fundamental hypocrisy with which terrorism is treated in the media.
The headline reads: "Tax Protester Crashes Plane into IRS Office."
What the headline should read is "Domestic Terrorist Crashes Plane Into IRS Office."
By definition, Joseph Stack's attack against civilians is a terrorist attack.
However, in the American media imagination, only brown skinned, black haired foreigners are terrorists. Therefore, Joseph Stack must be something else.
By labeling him a "tax protester," the WSJ is re-casting his act of terrorism within a symbolic field that elicits public sympathy for the act.
Moreover, it is not until the 3rd paragraph in the article that the WSJ reports that 18 peole were injured, 2 of whom are in critical condition.
Terrorism against civilians is reprehensible. No cause, however noble, can justify wanton attacks against civilians.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
I am guilty of sentimentalizing children. They are literally our future. We must not foresake them. Yet we do, over and over again. And ...
-
(Hat tip: The argument outlined here was suggested in a careful assemblage of Enenews headlines, particularly this one: Radiation jumps ...
-
Perhaps you've read that although individuals are being exhorted to "save the planet," corporations are the biggest polluter...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.