Glaring Propaganda in the Wall Street Journal

This is the letter I sent to the Wall Street Journal after being sickened by their outright propaganda:

The following article is in need of correction:

Article: Power, Stephen & Smith, Rebecca (2011, July 18). Nuclear plant safety proposals put on fast track. The Wall Street Journal, p. A3.

The print version of this article (referenced above) described the fukushima mega-disaster as “a partial meltdown” and I QUOTE directly.

I know the Wall Street Journal is not oblivious to the widely publicized news that the Fukushima disaster involved 3 total meltdowns and melt-throughs

'Melt-through' at Fukushima? / Govt report to IAEA suggests situation worse than meltdown http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110607005367.htm

Fukushima nuclear plant may have suffered 'melt-through', Japan admits
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/08/fukushima-nuclear-plant-melt-through?CMP=twt_gu

Dr Kaku transcript http://www.edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/2011.06.21.html
Fukushima 'still a ticking time bomb'

I hope that the WSJ will correct this glaring error. If not, I will conclude it is a deliberate propaganda effort.