Thursday, August 17, 2017

Free Speech in the Cross-Fire

Free speech - the cornerstone of American democracy and an increasing bane to government policy makers and others who would seek to control the parameters of acceptable conversation. 

The ACLU is under fire today in The New York Times for its support of free speech:
K-Sue Park (2017, August 17). The A.C.L.U. Needs to Rethink Free Speech. The New York Times,

The American Civil Liberties Union has a long history of defending the First Amendment rights of groups on both the far left and the far right. This commitment led the organization to successfully sue the city of Charlottesville, Va., last week on behalf of a white supremacist rally organizer. The rally ended with a Nazi sympathizer plowing his car into a crowd, killing a counterprotester and injuring many.

After the A.C.L.U. was excoriated for its stance, it responded that “preventing the government from controlling speech is absolutely necessary to the promotion of equality.” Of course that’s true. The hope is that by successfully defending hate groups, its legal victories will fortify free-speech rights across the board: A rising tide lifts all boats, as it goes.

While admirable in theory, this approach implies that the country is on a level playing field, that at some point it overcame its history of racial discrimination to achieve a real democracy, the cornerstone of which is freedom of expression.
The Wall Street Journal also contains today articles concerning proposed or actual restrictions on free speech:
Yoree Koh and Jacob Gershman (2017, August 17). US Tech firms are thrust into debate. The Wall Street Journal, B4.

...In the wake of weekend violence at a white supremacists' rally in Charlottesville, VA Alphabet Inc.'s Google and goDaddy Inc. stopped providing hosting support for the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi site that the companies said violanted their terms of service...Uber Technologies blacklisted white supremacist James Allen...

Deeepa Seetharaman (2017, August 17). Facebook Closed Offensive Forum. The Wall Street Journal, B4.
Facebook Inc dismantled a popular anonymous discussion board for employees last year that had become a forum for conservative political debate...
What is the point of shutting down conversation? I am strongly OPPOSED to censorship because I feel it simply fuels discontent and will make rancorous conversations go underground where they will fester and become increasingly solipsistic.

However, although I support free speech, I have also noted with dismay increasingly incendiary language directed against "the left," "progressives," and "snowflakes" on Internet sites that used to host a variety of perspectives. The incendiary language is promoting violence, of that I have no doubt.

For example, take a look at the "Antifa" meme that is playing out on alt-right Internet sites. Antifa is emerging among the alt-right as the symbolic equivalent of "neo-nazis" on the left, leading to representations of the group as being akin to some sort of organized communist invasion. This framing encourages de-humanization and objectification of demonstrators. Read about this ploy here:
Rob Kall (2017, August 16). Face down the Antifa. Oped news.
Antifa gives the alt-right a label to represent and demonize those who they disagree with just as surely as the label "neo-nazi" is used by the center-left.

I strongly doubt that most demonstrating Americans support left or right radicalism aimed at revolutionary action, but the orchestrators of public opinion would have us believe that there is a toxic virus in our communities that can only be suppressed through censorship and increasing domestic "security" controls.

Indeed, growing civil strife provides authoritarians the perfect pretext for eliminating free speech altogther through the development and circulation of censoring algorithms on the web.

I propose that responsible communication dialogue, where people are held accountable for their opinions and policy proposals, is a better mechanism for tempering the growing toxicity of the Internet, but rational dialogue does not seem to the be end game here.


  1. Surely Antifa is a domestic terror organization. And probably BLM. Charlottesville did not just happen. The governor and mayor were willing to have violence and did nothing much to stop it. It was a kind of false flag designed to give Trump a hard time. And now the statuary.

  2. Broken America | Jesse Lee Peterson and Stefan Molyneux


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.