Sunday, January 8, 2012

On Fukushima Spent Fuel Pool #4


Simply read the headlines:

1/1: Powerful quake rocks Tokyo region on New Year’s Day http://enenews.com/powerful-quake-rocks-tokyo-region-on-new-years-day

1/5: Report: 3 quakes right underneath Fukushima nuke plant — JNN live camera down immediately after — No word from Tepco, gov’t http://enenews.com/report-shallow-quake-right-underneath-fukushima-nuke-plant-jnn-live-camera-down-immediately-after-no-word-from-tepco-govt

1/2: Tepco: Recent quake caused water level drop in tank next to Spent Fuel Pool No. 4 http://enenews.com/tepco-new-years-quake-caused-water-level-drop-tank-next-spent-fuel-pool-4

1/5: 4.9 quake hits Fukushima at 6:28p EST http://enenews.com/4-9-quake-hits-fukushima-at-628p-est

1/8: Report: Spent Fuel Pool No. 4 boiled after powerful New Year’s quake, says plant worker http://enenews.com/report-spent-fuel-pool-4-lost-water-began-boil-after-70-new-years-quake-plant-worker/comment-page-1#comment-183161

1/7: Report: Huge, mysterious spike in cesium fallout after New Year’s quake (CHART) http://enenews.com/report-huge-mysterious-spike-cesium-fallout-after-new-years-quake-chart

1/6: 700 cpm beta Phoenix radnet January 6 http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/04/12/realtime-epa-radnet-japan-nuclear-radiation-monitoring-every-us-city-single-page-16511/

1/8: Bobby1 at Enenews http://enenews.com/report-spent-fuel-pool-4-lost-water-began-boil-after-70-new-years-quake-plant-worker

Bobby1 writes: The EPA gamma graphs show that gamma range 2 is higher than all the other ranges for Philadelphia:

This corresponds to the 100-200 KeV range for isotopes. Likely candidates are Krypton-85m, Cerium-141 and 144, Technetium-99m, and Uranium-235.

 

3 comments:

  1. You might need to simply the conclusion and put it at the top. "Surfers" may benefit from this:

    In 2012 TEPCO AGAIN! allowed a spent fuel pool to dry up, go into fission, and poison us AGAIN

    Also, there was some article on new Years stating how they knew they had a water level or circulation problem at R3 but they calculated that if the guys enjoyed a long new Years holiday, they could fix it on the fourth and their calculations should that there shouldn't be any problem with doing that.

    I am not making this up...we got a known problem, but boy we really need to enjoy our union holiday, so just ignore it for now.

    The arrogance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What are the potential hazards it can further have? Can anyone explain in simple language?

    I recently discovered the following dispersion model, which someone had linked to Berkeley’s discussion page. It uses TEPCO emission data to model possible dispersion patterns for Neptunium and Plutonium

    http://www.datapoke.org/blog/89/study-modeling-fukushima-npp-p-239-and-np-239-atmospheric-dispersion/

    http://datapoke.org/partmom/a=114

    If this model is accurate, it is very disturbing. Where are all of the so-called experts who claimed these elements were too heavy to travel far from the plant site?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Shreejana, the experts lied.
    This is my own site, it shows a massive uranium launch was the only way to create the amount of uranium measured and reported by the government in the air.

    http://nukepimp.blogspot.com/2012/01/uranium-in-air.html

    It means you should at least take basic precautions which are here.
    http://nukepimp.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-should-average-person-be-doing-now.html

    ReplyDelete