Official histories are always full of omissions and strategic ambiguities. History is, after all, written by those in power.
Howard Zinn, among many others, taught us (i.e., the governed or the "people") the importance of documenting alternative histories that reflect the perspectives and empirical realities experienced by everyday people and by marginalized authorities whose unwillingness to parrot official narratives leads to their censure.
The official Fukushima narrative is predicated upon four assumptions, all of which I call false:
1. The plant is officially in cold shutdown and radiation contamination is contained
2. No one died from the disaster and long term deaths are likely to be trivial
3. Fukushima produced less environmental contamination than Chernobyl
4. The indisputable ocean contamination produced by Fukushima is now gone
Assumptions 2 and 4 are evident in this article published by the Japan Times declaring that the Pacific Ocean is back to "normal":
Pacific Ocean radiation back near normal after Fukushima: study. AFP-JIJI Jul 4, 2016 http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/07/04/national/science-health/pacific-ocean-radiation-back-near-normal-after-fukushima-study/#.V3vWMKKYK5oMuch could be said about this article but in this post I will focus on the assumption that levels of radioactivity in ocean water are returning to normal.
SYDNEY – Radiation levels across the Pacific Ocean are rapidly returning to normal five years after the crisis at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant spewed gases and liquids into the sea, according to a study released Monday....
...Although no one is recorded as having died as a direct result of the nuclear accident, tens of thousands of people were uprooted, with many still unable to return home because of persistent contamination.
That statement can be both true and not-true simultaneously. The radionuclides may no longer be suspended in tested waters but that doesn't mean they are gone and that the Pacific ocean eco-system has returned to "normal."
In fact, it is empirically and logically impossible for most of the radionuclides from Fukushima in the ocean to have disappeared.
Radionuclides have a known decay pattern. Iodine-131 has an approximately 8 day half-life while Cesium-137 has an approximately 30 year half-life. Americium-241 has a 432 year half life.
While the Iodine-131 is probably gone, the Iodine-129 (with a 15.7 million half-life) is still there and contributing to radioactive contamination already present from dumping, atmospheric testing and nuclear accidents. As Wikipedia explains, "Most 129I derived radioactivity on Earth is man-made, an unwanted long-lived byproduct of early nuclear tests and nuclear fission accidents." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_iodine
Radionuclides with long half-lives contaminating the ocean are STILL THERE, still in the ocean, but perhaps they are no longer suspended in surface waters but rather have been absorbed by biological life or are suspended at lower levels in the water column.
BIOACCUMULATION
Official authorities can make the claim that the water has returned to "normal" (whatever that is after decades of dumping of waste and the effects of testing and accidents) because they are not examining how radionuclides have been sequestered in biological life.
In 2014, I conducted a historical search for bioaccumulation using the JSTOR index, focusing on the radionuclides known to present the majority sources of radiation derived from nuclear fallout: 241Am, 90Sr, 137Cs, 238Pu, 239Pu, and 240Pu (DOE, 1997, http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp156-c6.pdf).
Search results from the JSTOR index indicate that
bioaccumulation was first studied in the late 1950s by scientists looking at
the dispersion of radionuclides in the environment. They tended to be funded by
government: for example, Oak Ridge National Laboratory funded research on
bioaccumulation of radionuclides in “the marine environment.”
The research cited below finds clear evidence of
bioaccumulation of a wide range of radionuclides by aquatic life: Marine
organisms concentrate cesium 3-30 times over the levels in the surrounding
water, although concentration can be much higher, by two or three orders of
magnitude (Polikarpov 1966; Wolfe, 1971), especially in animals situated at the
top of the food chain, as modeled by Alva and Gobas for killer whales (Hat Tip Enenews poster but forgot source [sorry]):
Alva, Juan & Gobas,
Frank (2011, October 4). Modeling the Bioaccumulation Potential of Cesium-137
in a Marine Food Web of the Northwest Pacific, Canada[9080]. Paper presented at
SETAC North America 32nd Annual Meeting in Session 498: Environmental
Radiation: What Do We Know and What Should We Know for Assessing Risks http://www.researchgate.net/publication/233869698_Modeling_the_Bioaccumulation_Potential_of_Cesium_137_in_a_Marine_Food_Web_of_the_Northwest_Pacific_Canada
Other highly chemically and radiologically genotoxic radionuclides, such as Americium and Plutonium,
are highly BIO-AVAILABLE. For example, research conducted by Fisher,
Bjerregaard and Fowler (1983) found that Plutonium, Americium, and Californium concentrate
readily in marine plankton:
Nicholas S. Fisher,
Poul Bjerregaard and Scott W. Fowler (1983). Interactions of Marine Plankton
with Transuranic Elements. 1. Biokinetics of
Neptunium, Plutonium, Americium, and Californium in Phytoplankton.
Limnology and Oceanography, 28(3) (May, 1983), pp. 432-447 Published by:
American Society of Limnology and Oceanography. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2835825
“The results suggest
that Pu, Cf, and Am would associate with marine particles which could transport
them vertically, transfer them into the marine food web, or both”Page 445; Our results
are consistent with the hypothesis that the reactive transuranic elements (e.g.
Pu, Am, Co are likely to reach an equilibrium between surfaces of suspended
particles and ambient seawater and that the adsorptive properties of particles
scavenging these (and other) metals are governed by organic coatings
(Balistrieri et al. 1981).
Phytoplankton particles with associated transuranics
may sink slowly, transporting these elements to deeper waters and sediments
(Bowen et al. 1980; Santschi et al. 1980), or they may be ingested by
herbivores in surface waters. Once ingested, radionuclides may be assimilated
into food chains (Lowman et al. 1971; Koide et al. 1981) or defecated in the
form of fast-sinking fecal pellets (Higgo et al. 1977).
It is interesting that radionuclides such as Cesium
and Americium bioaccumulate in different areas of organisms, and at different
concentrations with Americium levels higher than Cesium, as illustrated by this
study:
Metian, Marc, Warnau,
Michel, Teyssie, Jean-Louis, Bustamante, Paco (2011) Characterization
of Am-241 and Cs-134 bioaccumulation in the king
scallop Pecten maximus: investigation via three exposure pathways. Journal of
Environmental Radioactivity, 102(6), 543-550 DOI:
10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.02.008
[Abstract] In order to
understand the bioaccumulation of Am-241 and
Cs-134 in scallops living in sediments, the uptake and depuration kinetics of
these two elements were investigated in the king scallop Pecten maximus exposed
via seawater, food, or sediment under laboratory conditions. Generally, Am-241
accumulation was higher and its retention was stronger than Cs-134.
This was
especially obvious when considering whole animals exposed through seawater with
whole-body concentration factors (CF7d) of 62 vs. 1, absorption efficiencies
(A(0l)) of 78 vs. 45 for seawater and biological half-lives (T-b1/2l) of 892 d
vs. 22 d for Am-241 and Cs-134, respectively. In contrast, following a single
feeding with radiolabelled phytoplankton, the assimilation efficiency (AE) and
T-b1/2l of Cs-134 were higher than those of Am-241 (AE: 28% vs. 20%; T-b1/2l:
14 d vs. 9 d).
Among scallop tissues, the shells always contained the higher
proportion of the total body burden of Am-241 whatever the exposure pathway. In
contrast, the whole soft parts presented the major fraction of whole-body
burden of Cs-134, which was generally associated with muscular tissues. Our
results showed that the two radionuclides have contrasting behaviors in
scallops, in relation to their physico-chemical properties.
Through absorption and adsorption radionuclides in
the water column are readily assimilated by phytoplankton, whereupon they are
either consumed – resulting in biomagnification – or fall towards the bottom of
the ocean. A significant percentage (estimated at about a 1/2
of cellular load) of Pu and Am accumulated by plankton fall to intermediate
depths, where they remain suspended, resulting in the “enrichment of waters of
intermediate depth with Pu or Am lost from sinking algal cells” (Fisher et al,
1983).
In other words, the radioactive and chemically toxic radionuclides are still present but are not suspended in surface waters. They are interred in biological life!
FUKUSHMA IS A CONTAMINATED-WATER PRODUCING MACHINE AND IT AINT' OVER YET
TEPCO has been dumping radioactive water deliberately for years. I have documented this claim in my 2013 and 2016 monographs (see Nadesan Fukushim and the Privatization of Risk 2013 AND Crisis Communication, Liberal Democracy, and Ecological Sustainability 2016).
Moreover, Fukushima is STILL leaking contaminated water into the ocean. That water is highly radioactive, as evidenced by rising ground water contamination at the plant. That is why TEPCO built the ice-wall, which has not been successful according to company officials.
You can see documentation of rising ground water contamination here:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/ground-water-contamination-rising-at.html
There exists good evidence that part of the reactor fuel from units 1-3 is located in the underground river that empties into the Pacific Ocean:
This scenario will result in endless contamination of the ocean with rising levels of Strontium contamination, according to the German Risk Studies.
The “German Risk Study, Phase B” found that a core meltdown accident could result in complete failures of all structural containment, causing melted fuel to exit the reactor foundation within five days (cited in Bayer, Tromm, & Al-Omari 1989).
Moreover, the study found that even in the event of an intact building foundation, passing groundwater would be in direct contact with fuel, causing leaching of fission products. Strontium leaches slower than cesium. A follow-up German study, “Dispersion of Radionuclides and Radiation Exposure after Leaching by Groundwater of a Solidified Core-Concrete Melt,” predicted that strontium contamination levels would rise exponentially years after a full melt-through located adjacent to a river (Bayer, Tromm, & Al-Omari, 1989).
The study’s experimental conditions are roughly similar to Daiichi’s site conditions, including groundwater emptying into an adjacent river, whereas Daiichi is physically situated above an underground river emptying into the sea.
The study predicted concentrations of Strontium-90 in river water would spike relatively suddenly, but maintain extraordinarily high levels of contamination for years: “The highest radionuclide concentration of approx. 1010 Bq/m3 is reached by Sr-90 after some 5000 days.”
CONCLUSIONS
The alternative narrative I have written here is precisely that, alternative. I am a peon. I have no authority to speak as a "social scientist," as I have been reminded by trolls and certain polemical scientists over the last 5 years.
However, my lack of official expertise does not mean I am wrong.
The contradictions and elisions marring the official narrative will become more glaring with time, as Pacific life continues its inexorable collapse, offering fodder for those like myself who persist in challenging the genocidal authority of the nuclear-security state with alternative narratives, which lack official legitimacy but are no less true because of that deficiency.
REFERENCES
Bayer, A., Al-Omari, I., & Tromm, W. (1989). Dispersion of radionuclides and radiation exposure after leaching by groundwater of a solidified core-concrete (No. KFK-4512). Available http://www.irpa.net/irpa8/cdrom/VOL.1/M1_97.PDF
Gesellschaft fur Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) Deutsche Risikikostudie Kernkraftwerke, Phase B Report GRS-89 cited in Bayer, A., Al-Omari, I., & Tromm, W. (1989). Dispersion of radionuclides and radiation exposure after leaching by groundwater of a solidified core-concrete (No. KFK-4512). Available http://www.irpa.net/irpa8/cdrom/VOL.1/M1_97.PDF
“TEPCO Announced Record Cesium Level Found in Groundwater Beneath Fukushima Levee” The Asahi Shimbun (February 14, 2014): http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201402140041). The article said that cesium found in groundwater under a coastal levee near unit 1 spiked from 76,000 Becquerels per liter on February 12, 2014 to 130,000 Becquerels per liter on February 13, reaching the highest level of cesium ever detected at that location
Record strontium-90 level in Fukushima groundwater sample last July. (2014, February 7). The Japan Times. Available http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/02/07/national/record-strontium-90-level-in-fukushima-groundwater-sample-last-july/#.U2XIw17K3yh
Photo Journal: Radioactive water still leaking from Fukushima plant
ReplyDeleteNovember 6, 2015 (Mainichi Japan) http://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20151106/p2a/00m/0na/003000c
The everyday world we live in is largely a product of money and deception. It often seems as if almost all the history we are exposed to has been composed by hack novelists. And news eventually becomes history. So hack journalists as well.
ReplyDeleteMoney makes for a good incentive to falsify and tamper with scientific procedures. Unfortunately I think most people either do not know what they are doing or do not care. Currently the medical profession has no trouble whatsoever buying the medical science they need including, I fear , lab results showing cancer regardless of whether they show that or not! It has got to be much easier to buy tests for radiation and to buy a PhD to affirm the findings. So most of the studies are worthless. I personally have never had contact with one of the Elite and do not have first hand experience of how they see things.
Here is a testimonial by the editor of the Lancet that supports your claim about flawed research:
Deletehttp://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1.pdf
#2 says no one died from the accident and that long term deaths from the accident are likely to be trivial. Who decides whose long term death is trivial?
ReplyDeleteYes, who decides?
DeleteI personally do not believe there were no deaths directly attributable to Fukushima. Remember the plant manager died of cancer of the esophagus but TEPCO declared it wasn't caused by the disaster.
How many plant workers have died? They weren't even tracked for years after the disaster.
Who decides whether the risks outweigh the purported benefits?
Not the average person I'm afraid.
A lie is being perpetrated on the Internet that no fatalities have resulted from the ongoing Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe. Anyone using any semblance of logic will know that this is fantasy!
Deletehttp://technologypals.com.au/fatalities-and-injuries-resulting-from-the-fukushima-nuclear-catastrophe
Great work Majia! Where I am not already banned I shall drop a link to your rebuttal.
ReplyDeletestock out
I gathered some of the liar articles in my article here
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-latest-fukushima-lie-ocean-is-back.html
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/02/a-scientific-basis-for-destruction-of.html
ReplyDeleteChitin is a radiation magnet
All the critters that are hardest hit use Chitin in their body structures.
Very interesting article about chitin. It certainly makes sense.
DeleteYou know more than most so-called scientists because so much is hidden and so many are brainwashed Majia. You have a keenly analytical mind. Much more so than any of the pronuclear scientists that I have ever read or heard.
ReplyDeleteI like your wording "Nuclear security state." The most Orwellian term ever! Nuclear production facilities, nuclear bombs, nuclear waste, and so-called benign nuclear medical and nuclear industrial applications are a further tipping point of no return. They have evolved from, and are organically part of the Nuclear security state.
Nuclear reactors are uneconomical and deadly enmasse. Nuclear reactors are huge monstrous vestiges of the fraudulent atoms for peace program dreamt-up by the nuclear-vampire monster Edward Teller.
Boiling water with uranium and plutonium for energy is the most insane notion ever conceived by humans. We allow our masters to continue building these rattle-traps with miles of pipes and hundreds of tons of metal that cannot possibly contain the nuclear death. It was never technology. The combined nuclear and military industries of the "Nuclear Security State" have carried out the creation of nuclear power plants, bombs, and production facilities. Nuclear industrial applications have been coincidentally funded and nurtured that are largely unnecessary. They have evolved for the profits and dark ambitions of crazy psychopaths on a massive earth covering scale.
Nuclear power was originated and is perpetuated by the insane military-industrial complex and still largely affiliated with it. The nuclear security state, that was evolved with the justification to protect us, has now extensively nuclear poisoned the U S of A with nuclear waste and death traps.
It started with ambitious weapons programs. Nuclear weapons programs started the massive psychotic-boondoggles and creation of death poisonings that have gone completely awry.
The nuclear death poisons now contaminate the entire continent and threaten to go from highly poisonous chronic toxins to acute toxins. The sheer volume and density of nuclear poisons in our water supplies, food supplies, soil, and air is reaching a breaking point.
The nuclear power plants in the USA are like massive Armageddon terrorist bombs our corporate and government masters have unleashed against its own people. We are now one huge solar flare, any limited nuclear strike, or any terrorist strikes away from sure nuclear Armageddon for the whole continent.
The insidious phase of nuclear poisoning from our nuclear industries and military industrial complex is dwindling. We are rapidly approaching the tipping point of no return from the ubiquitous, acute- nuclear toxin poisoning. The acute poisoning phase is not simply coming from us. It has a horrendously cumulative effect from nuclear pollution all over the world, as the eye-opening cause and effects of Fukushima on us and Chernobyl on Europe illustrate to clear-minded people like you Majia. Thanks for being here Majia.
Mania you are a high-caliber scientist. You do not flaunt your credientials for monetary gain or competitive ego and ideological gratification.
ReplyDeleteMajia
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThank you tearing into the false narratives. Every time I come across the liars "articles" I am at a loss - I don't understand why they are allowed to continue lying. Some nations have laws about news - they can not lie or fabricate "news." Stay well!
ReplyDeleteGood research! Where do you find the time in your busy schedule? Kudos. JEC
ReplyDeleteNavy nuclear engineer disputes the safety of nuclear
ReplyDeletehttp://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/dotearth/2013/08/16/a-nuclear-submariner-challenges-a-pro-nuclear-film/?_r=0&referer=http://m.search.aol.com/search?query=james+hansen+pronuclear
Amory Levans, the famous physicist wrote an article in Forbes saying that closing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear power plant in California would save money and carbon. One of his articles was published in Forbes the prominent conservative business magazine.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.syracuse.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/06/ny_should_follow_california_plan_for_closing_diablo_canyon_nuclear_plants_your_l.html
Jeremy Rifkin. Prominent financial man on why nuclear is uneconomical
ReplyDeleteA Green Road - Jeremy Rifkin - 5 Reasons Why Nucl…: http://youtu.be/f3ESmSJNT0k
I sometimes park my car under a palm tree, in the past when leaves contacted the vehicle, ants used to crawl outside the car. Now there are no ants at all. Things are changing everywhere.
ReplyDeleteThe very first underground nuclear explosion took place on this day in 1957. The test explosion was conducted by the United States government during a series of nuclear weapons tests and trials in the 1950s named Operation Plumbbob. This test in particular was named Rainier and was held at the Nevada Test Site near the city of Las Vegas, Nevada. nuclear explosion
ReplyDelete