Thursday, November 22, 2012

MISSING RADIATION DATA



TEPCO adds missing radiation data to online archive November 20, 2012 http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201211200029
THE ASAHI SHIMBUN

[Excerpted] Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Nov. 19 that previously missing radiation monitoring data taken during the early phase of last year's nuclear disaster is now available from the utility's online database. 

The data in question concerns readings at monitoring posts on the grounds of TEPCO's Fukushima 

No. 2 nuclear power plant, 12 kilometers south of the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant.

Readings taken between 9 a.m. on March 15 and 11 p.m. on April 3, 2011, had been partially missing from the public-access database.

The readings show radiation levels quadrupled abruptly to 80 microsieverts per hour at 9:40 a.m. on March 16....

Majia here: One wonders what is missing from the data. 

Fukushim Diary reported that Tepco may be hiding unknown explosion occurred on 3/16/2011
[Excerpted] NHK reported the spiking up of radiation level was monitored on 3/16/2011 at Fukushima Daini, where is 12km south to Daiichi. 

This plant did not have meltdown supposedly. The radiation level jumped up from 20 μSv/h to 87.7 μSv/h, when was from 9:40AM to 9:50AM of 3/16/2011. The data had not been published until NHK requested Tepco for disclosure.

Officially, there was no plant explosion on 3/16/2011.

It is confirmed that around at 8:30AM of the same day, huge amount of white smoke was spouting out from reactor3. At 10:40AM, 10,000μSv/h of radiation was monitored at the entrance of Fukushima Daiichi plant. However, NISA reported it may be from reactor2 for some reason. They heard the explosive sound from reactor2 on 3/15/2011, but it’s not 3/16/2011 and it didn’t have an explosion supposedly.

Also, around at 5:45AM of the same day, it is confirmed that reactor4 had fire on the North-West side of the 4th floor. However, details have never been reported. It is still not known what exactly happened to cause the unusual radiation spiking up in the morning of 3/16/2011, when none of the plants were supposed to have exploded.

Tepco is stating that they are going to investigate why they did not publish the data.


Majia here: Too much missing data in the Fukushima crisis....


Nov 08, 2012
Ex-SKF Wednesday, November 7, 2012 Japanese Government Now Admits 675 Radiation Monitoring Posts Show "10% Lower" Than Actual Levels, "Beyond Expectation" Says Ministry of Education. [excerpted] Why 10% ...
Oct 06, 2012
[i] Hiroo Sunaoshi and Kazuyuki Kanai Government ignored U.S. radiation monitoring data in days after 3/11. The Asahi Shimbun (2012, June 18). http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201206180048 ...
 
Nov 20, 2011
"The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology says that a government project to operate real-time radiation monitoring devices at schools and other public facilities in Fukushima Prefecture will be ...
 
Nov 12, 2012
Someone of 148production went to a park in Fukushima and measured the background radiation level. He recorded 2 microsieverts an hour. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko1t92IM44A 2 microsv an hour X 24 hours = 48 ...
 
Oct 10, 2012
Former Minister for Internal Affairs Haraguchi Kazuhiro has alleged that radiation monitoring station data was actually three decimal places greater than the numbers released to the public. If this is true, it constitutes a “national ...
 
Majia here: And if you think this sort of tampering doesn't occur in the US, read these posts and consider the possibilities:
Jan 31, 2012
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/04/12/realtime-epa-radnet-japan-nuclear-radiation-monitoring-every-us-city-single-page-16511/. After looking at more cities across the nation I see that the entire system was offline ...
Nov 27, 2011
Stagner worked at the original Nevada Test Site and has years of scientific expertise in radiation monitoring and testing. He has productively employed his expertise to the problems of air and water quality in Arizona by ...

No comments:

Post a Comment